What mass decides what for who? Is is the Christian mass that forbids people to love or to show their love by sharing their bed?

Is it the mass of positive results that make that neurological therapies are paid when they are used to treat patients in coma?

Or is it the mass of negative results of the treatments of patients in coma that make that no one can imagine that a patient in coma would be able to move if he would be helped to do so?

Why do people complain that they tried everything and nothing helps and do not want to change the program they made for the treatment of the patient in coma?

The mother that was happy to live of the money that the insurance company paid because the insured person became patient in coma did not want her relative to be treated by the hpi-method.

She had a very good feeling and knew that that treatment would make it possible for her relative to come into movement again. It will only be a question of time.

The connections that are made will make that her relative will come into movement. The proof of the hpi-method can not be given by not using it.

All those that say that the hpi-method is not capable to help patients into movement do everything they can imagine to proove that. Those that used the hpi-method will have other experiences.

It is not about money but prestige? Depending on? Who decides what method is used? The chemical industries? The organisation that develloped a machine to measure the brain activity and found out that the patient in coma has mental activity?

Did they not look into the eyes and see it?